A computational lifetime prediction of a thermal shock experiment. Part II: discussion on difference fatigue criteria
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A Benchmark on Lifetime Prediction of Composite Materials under Fatigue
The present paper describes a benchmarking programme to compare different lifetime prediction methodologies. Lifetime prediction is still a complex task and the results depend on many factors. Thus, it is very important to know which factors have a decisive effect on the results. The main objective of this investigation is not to proof the validity of a certain prediction model, but to quantify...
متن کاملA new low cycle fatigue lifetime prediction model for magnesium alloy based on modified plastic strain energy approach
Nowadays, the technology intends to use materials such as magnesium alloys due to their high strength to weight ratio in engine components. As usual, engine cylinder heads and blocks has made of various types of cast irons and aluminum alloys. However, magnesium alloys has physical and mechanical properties near to aluminum alloys and reduce the weight up to 40 percents. In this article, a new ...
متن کاملThermal shock and thermal fatigue study of ceramic materials on a newly developed ascending thermal shock test equipment
A test equipment was designed to study thermal shock and thermal fatigue of ceramic materials subjected to fast heating (ascending). The equipment was designed to generate thermal stress in a test specimen by heating one surface of it by an oxy-hydrogen flame while cooling the opposite surface. The sample cracked when thermal stress exceeded its mechanical strength. The in situ crack formation ...
متن کاملA Theoretical Prediction of the Bs-Meson Lifetime Difference
We present the results of a quenched lattice calculation of the operator matrix elements relevant for predicting the Bs width difference. Our main result is (∆ΓBs/ΓBs) = (4.7 ± 1.5 ± 1.6) × 10−2, obtained from the ratio of matrix elements R(mb) = 〈B̄0 s |QS |B0 s 〉/〈B̄0 s |QL|B s 〉 = −0.93(3)+0.00 −0.01. R(mb) was evaluated from the two relevant B-parameters BMS S (mb) = 0.86(2) +0.02 −0.03 and B...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Fatigue <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures
سال: 2006
ISSN: 8756-758X,1460-2695
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.0983.x